When you got a really big codebase and lots of developers working on it, releasing new features and bugfixes every 2-3 weeks, it seems impossible to migrate to Zend Framework 2, soon.
That's because you can't stop further development, you have customers waiting for the new features, they wait for bugfix releases, to get stuff running, that's buggy, you have more than 1mio lines of code and possibly > 100 active developers on that codebase. How can you migrate?
I stombled accross this problem already when the first ZF2 betas came out and startet to write some code that should solve the problem.
The result is HumusMvc, it integrates Zend Framework 2's ModuleManager and ServiceManager in a ZF1 application.
The migration path
First of all, you create a new skeleton for you application. Simply clone the HumusMvcSkeletonApplication and use it as base for you skeleton app.
At the next step, you create a repository per module you have in your old ZF1 application. Put the source code in the "src/" directory of that module, create a Module.php file, name the Module, put the module configuration in it, etc. - in other words, create a simple ZF2 module out of your ZF1 application module. If you use HumusMvcAssetManager, too, you can also provide a public directory in your module and use the asset manger. That way you can override assets in a very similar way you override view scripts in a ZF1 application.
The module now can look something like this:
If you use ZF1 with the Resource-Autoloader, than you don't have psr-0 compliant classnames, so define your autoloading simply with classmap autoloader.
In order to install your module, just require it with composer.
In your module.config.php you provide your front_controller configuration, you have to tell the front controller, that you have a module, where it can dispatch.
You can now define some resources with ZF2's service manager in your module config file. You can remove those resources from bootstrapping later. HumusMvc ships with Navigation, Translator and Locale factories, so you don't need to handle these, just configure them.
If you have something like a db connection, that was bootstrapped in your old application, you need to do this again. Therefore you use the "onBootstrap" event. Well, you could define everything right now with the service manager, but that is exactly that much work, we wanted not to do now, because that would stop the further development for quite a time.
Here is a short example you to bootstrap db connection on every request and put the application configuration into Zend_Registry.
At first, I recommend to remove all "onBootstrap" methods when neccessary and put this stuff in your service manager, so you only instantiate the objects, when they are need, not on every request.
In the next refactoring rounds, you can refactor only one module at a time, so development in the other modules can still be done. Put all stuff in the service manager and use it as a service locator inside your application. Remove Zend_Registry everywhere. When you are done with that, use a php namespacer tool (or do it by manually) and refactor to a namespaced codebase. Remember, code is per module, so you can do this step module per module. Further bugfixing and development of new features is still possible.
Final migration to Zend Framework 2
You should now have a very flexible and modern Zend Framework 1 application, that makes use of a lot of stuff from Zend Framework 2, already: Service Manager, Module Manager, Event Manager, just to name a few. You don't have any expensive upfront bootstrapping any more, you moved everything to the service manger. You should have a namespaced codebase. You use ZF 2 classes much more, than ZF1 classes. - Now it's time to do the final migration.
Refactor all controllers, refactor route configuration refactor all view scripts, and so on. Now it's time for the hard work, we skipped before - but we had a couple of month time to bring our codebase to something, that _can_ be refactored to a ZF2 codebase very fast.
Friday, October 12, 2012
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
The dependency injection pattern - A short exampleWhat we see here, is a class with several dependencies: The first two obvious dependencies are "SomeObject" and "Zend_Config_Ini", but addiotional with have also the dependency to the path of the config file ("path/to/my/configfile.ini") and the APPLICATION_ENV constant. So all together we have 4 dependencies, two of them to other objects. The problem starts, when I want to extend this class or I want to write unit tests and need to mock a lot of stuff. Let's improve this example and make it DI enabled.
SomeClassWithDependencies is now DI enabled code. It has no hard dependencies on a concrete instance, instead it gets its dependencies injected. The main difference is now, how you use the class. Before the refactoring, you could simply instantiate the class and work with it. No you have to do some wiring upfront.
If you use this class a couple of times in your application, you have redundant code everywhere you instantiate the class. Imagine even how complex things can be, if we have hundreds of classes like that. Where to put the wiring? The answer is: in a inversion of control container. An inversion of control container is simple object, that creates all services for you and holds the instantiation wiring.
Dependency Injection Container (DIC)A DIC gets configured and is able to instantiate objects from its configuration. Ralph Schindler said: "DiC's require that you meta-program. You configure it, the container does all of the new calls. This means that instead of programming, you're metaprogramming." DIC's get their configuration and additional some DIC's (like Zend_Di) have the abbilities for auto-wiring and auto-instantiation.
Service LocatorA service locator instantiates objects by calling factories or closures. It isn't able to auto-wire or auto-instantiate. It can only create, what is defined in its factories and closures. However, when the service locator doesn't get injected into an object, so that the consuming object is able the pull soft dependencies from it, it isn't a real service locator, just a simple container that produces instances by name.
Other relavant posts:
Inversion of Control Containers and the Dependency Injection pattern by Martin Fowler
Learning about dependency injection and PHP by Ralph Schindler